|

We are
asking you about a kind of Iranian typography that uses the
distraction of types and moves the alphabets up and down. What is
your opinion?
I discussed
similar things with young designers that I met. I discuss the use of
type to understand which is a nice type and which is very a bad type
with you. Because I just see signs, lines, proportions and I don’t
understand- I have no feeling to understand the difference between
what I see. Anyway I saw some interesting works of young designers
(in Isfahan for example) using Farsi alphabet very spaced. A sign
and space with another sign and space, breaking the words that were
very strange and really interesting to me. This is very similar to
me in using type and space to emphasize on the time in reading and
to introduce a new dimension in a typographic composition.
You know it
is not normal because in Farsi always there is a link between
letters and it is not readable.
What I mean
is that I noticed in some works (also of the 5th Color) there is an
attempt to work in a different way on calligraphy. You are not a
calligrapher but probably sort of a generation of digital
calligraphers so you take the type and work on it.
So you
prefer to call it calligraphy more than typography, right?
In this
sense yes, sure. Your work might be similar to what I do. I am not a
type designer I am working on type in a digital way with the
computer and what you do is mixing different techniques by hand,
photocopy, then Photoshop and other things.
But I like
to see your work on title of a poster because you say you are not a
calligrapher but in a way you are. Because you are working with
different tools which is a traditional type.
You know in
western eye it is a calligraphy because of the definition of
calligraphy and typography. We call our works typography. But in
western eye it is not typography may be because there is no exact
type. It is closer to calligraphy. It is a good thing to discuss and
have interview about but now we would like to ask you some other
questions. Please tell us about the use of graphic design like
posters in the society. For example in Italy when you do a poster it
is so important that you use it in the streets but here I think
there is another kind of designing posters because there are not
good spaces for the posters and maybe it is very important in
graphic design.
Also in
Italy or in other countries someone says that the posters are
communication tools that don’t work very well. I don’t think so. It
is like people that many years ago said that the books were
finished. It depends on how you use it. Many posters I have designed
had been hanged indoor only like the universities. This is not a
problem of poster design but how the municipality decides to hang
the poster. Because 100x70 centimeter posters work very well in a
place you walk and not in a place you are driving a car. They are
too small. But on the other side the example of the famous Italian
brand “Benetton” that became internationally well-known. Mainly
through advertising with posters, not through commercials on TV.
They used a lot of large posters not really posters (billboards)
located in highways. As you can understand the problem is the size,
the readability, not the tool.
The poster
is just one of the means of media you can use. It is up to you how
to use it and if you use it in an appropriate way.
But I saw
many places to hang posters in Tehran and Isfahan. Because people
walk and the traffic jam is usual, people go slowly in the town. And
it is a very good choice to hang posters in the city. I don’t know
why you don’t do it. I just saw very bad posters I think you
explained them as bad advertising. But I don’t understand why you
don’t use these places to hang posters.
I think
it’s just for advertising and you must pay a lot to hang a poster
everywhere with cultural subjects. It’s not normal to do the same
things.
You could
start to use it. I know it’s very expensive to use these places but
this is not the problem if the poster communicates or not. The
problem is that it’s too expensive to use. It could be a nice tool
to communicate. Because I think it’s a very simple and old media,
and it works if it is used well.
As a
graphic designer from a western country how do you think designers
can keep their personality while using their history, roots and
heritage of design in their works?
I think the
most important thing for a designer is the culture. The more you
know, the freer you are to design and to choose your way.
First of
all look at the close roots in your town and your country. For
example my home-town and my country, Italy, but also the European
culture is very important to me.
I say to my
students they have to study a lot. Of course it is not enough to
study, you have to be talented which is a gift that someone receives
but another one not.
But I think
that having a large and deep culture helps to judge if the way of
the other people is right or not and also helps to choose one’s way.
Someone is
more interested in roots, someone is interested in most recent
things. But I think you have to know the development of your own
tradition to continue it and to evolve it. With your influences of
course because I think probably you are influenced by western design
but also you don’t know or you don’t want it. In many cases I think
you are right because western graphic design is probably the most
developed one in the world together with Japanese. You have in some
way to look at what have been done in different ways. Then to take
your way and keep your tradition, do not copy. The approach is
important not the style.
In the
history of your country for example Roman alphabet with serif is so
important. Is it true? If it’s true why don’t you use sans-serif
alphabets in your work?
This is
what people think that old type (the first type) was Serif but it is
not true. Latin alphabet comes from Greek alphabet, let’s say the
direct consequence of Greek alphabet. The first sample of Greek
alphabet and the most beautiful example is without serif-very
straight lines. Then also in the development of the Latin alphabets
there are many old examples of typefaces without serif.
One of the
best historians of the Latin alphabet is James Mosley, the former
director of the St. Bride Printing Library in London. He explained
very well -in a book called “The Nymph and the Grot”- that the
Sans-serif typeface is not something belonged to the 20th century
but something very old. Nowadays, nobody could say for sure why
someone put the serif on types which is the main reason that Serif
exists on type face. Could it be only some decoration, some styles
to do with letters. Some might say that Serif typefaces are more
readable than Sans-serif ones, but we know that in the road sign
system or in many famous underground train systems, we mainly use
Sans-serif typefaces because they are more readable. So in my search
in using less elements than possible and to be simple and very
straight, I start to use Sans-serif. It is not a dogma. It is not
something that I imposed to my students or collaborators. At the
beginning it was a search to find a very straight way to communicate
but now it is a sort of feeling. I am no more able to use Serif
typeface. Something strange I can’t explain. I feel better when I
use Sans-serif!
>Back
|